Crossing our River Styx

Crossing our River Styx

Last fortnight’s passage of the Food Security and Land Acquisition legislation was a tactical triumph for the ruling coalition.  The opposition had to bite its tongue; it was a clever feint, but the body blows are landing fast and hard on growth and investment, and we are against the ropes, bloodied and dazed.  The truth is that those in authority have lost all credibility, and those in business have lost their social contract.  Crony capitalism coupled with cruelly capricious decisions has gutted what was not so long ago a raging bull of an economy.

If you go back to the mid-2000s, India was growing very rapidly and the belief of the middle classes and business was that there was a very talented team running the economy, with an economist prime minister and a half-decent finance minister. There was faith that the central bank would keep inflation low and all would be well.

All of that has come to nought. The RBI let inflation get out of control. Relations between the RBI governor and the finance minister were appallingly bad.

Most of us do not seem to grasp the seriousness of the situation.  Food price inflation was ignored under the pretext that the benefits of growth needed to spread to rural India.  Gorged with high inflows of foreign funds, the government threw money around like a drunkard at a casino.  Indians felt they had an inalienable right to grow rapidly, that India was finally getting the growth it deserved.  The goal of “spreading” the riches to the mythical aam admi  became a moral and not an economic issue.

India did not recognise the fragility of growth. Prices – chiefly of food – rose and rose inexorably. If inflation is very high, people turn away from money.  They stop saving through the financial system and turn to gold.  What had almost never happened in any developing economy happened here – as the economy slowed down, there was a blowing out of the current account.  Instead of imports slowing, Indians shipped in more and more gold.  As the downturn deepened, investments fell and savings fell even more because of inflation, so people ‘saved’ with gold.  India’s current account was being financed by foreign savings, a.k.a. foreign fund inflows.  That was fine so long as growth was rapid.  But in 2012 India really started to slow down.  This had nothing to do with the United States, or Ben Bernanke, or the terror of “tapering”. Simply put, foreigners became very reluctant to lend money to spendthrift India.  The rupee’s exchange rate began to weaken a little over a year ago. When P. Chidambaram took over he initially tried to restore the credibility of the government but here’s what happened:

1.    The government still did not tackle Consumer Price Inflation.

2.    Chidambaram’s attempts to introduce reforms and reduce the budget deficit proved to be a chimera. The bankruptcy of policy was badly exposed when the government passed the Food Security Act.  This meant that it could not care less about the budget deficit.

Gold imports will climb even higher in the months ahead.  The rupee, which has already been factored in at 70 to the dollar, will slip even lower.  So what can we do? We need to restore credibility to policy.   We need big measures, and political courage.  We need to be able to stand up and say that the Food Security Bill is great but we cannot afford it right now.  We need to be able to say “We learned a lesson – when you have excellent growth, you don’t spend all the money.” 

The trouble is that our policy dinosaurs don’t view inflation as a problem or growth as fragile.  The result is that investors, both domestic and foreign, who have to deal with the real economy, have lost confidence.

The two most important and critically urgent goals now are: keep inflation low, and keep the budget deficit under control, or we will end up like Zimbabwe. 

“I would not use ‘crisis’ and ‘India’ in the same sentence,” new central bank governor Raghuram Rajan told reporters on September 4.  Yes, but how quickly have ‘growth’ and ‘India’ become antonyms.

(This column appeared in Business Today, Sept 29 2013)

It’s the elections, stupid

Pranab Mukherjee is starting to look worryingly like a feckless heir squandering his generous inheritance while his fretful guardian in the person of Duvvuri Subbarao tries to board up the door and keep the wolves at bay with a nail here and a nail there.

The “history sheet” is simple and clear. Later this month, Mukherjee will present his third budget since the United Progressive Alliance came to power in the 2009 election. UPA-I, by hugely increasing social-sector expenditure in its two final years, 2007-2009, effectively torpedoed the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, which mandates that fiscal deficit be cut to 3 per cent of GDP by 2008/09.

India’s financial mandarins argued that fiscal stimulation was called for to battle the global downturn and to deepen “inclusive” growth. The fiscal deficit shot up to 6.0 per cent in 2008/09, 6.7 per cent in 2009/10, and is projected at 5.5 per cent in 2010/22. As a Royal Bank of Scotland analysis put it, even if you take the windfall from the 3G spectrum auction into account, achieving next year’s 4.8 per cent target seems impossible. And to think that back in 2004, flush from its victory, the UPA actually predicted a balanced budget by 2008/09.

Experts will tell you that once the economy had come through the recessionary shoals, the aam admi stimulus ought to have been pulled back and more funds poured into infrastructure and manufacturing. Instead, populist spending is only likely to increase, said Dr Rajiv Kumar, Director General of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, or FICCI. Mukherjee, ever the fixer-upper for the Congress party, will have to keep an eye out for five key state elections this summer, including West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The spending cannot stop. The Uttar Pradesh state election in 2012 will call for some huge sops. Then comes 2013, and the general election – assuming the UPA government is still in power, scandals, legislative gridlock and all.

An international economist who closely watches India said with ample revenues in its coffers, the fiscal situation ought to have improvc1ed. “But it is not. Instead, all the revenues (and more) are being spent on new social programmes. Now it is true that social indicators are poor, and more needs to be done to help the poor. But it is hard to avoid the impression that the government sees the poor as vote banks, which they can tap as long as they provide them with funds. And surely at least a portion of the revenues could be saved, to give India some manoeuvring room in case a crisis hits?”

“There has been too much stoking up of consumption demand,” said Kumar, “and not enough capacity expansion.” The central bank, too, says only by spending more on capital expenditure will the government be able to fight some of the bottlenecks that contribute to supply-side inflation.

Inflation is now entrenched, and food price inflation is here to stay, fuelled by rising consumption of proteins as buying power increases in the countryside. The RBI’s review of the September-December 2010 economy commented drily that “The rise in food inflation has not only persisted for more than two years now, the increase has been rather sharp in the recent period.” And Subbarao, in his January 25 statement after the central bank raised interest rates for the seventh time this fiscal year, said: “Food inflation has remained at an elevated level for about two years and the prospect of it spilling over to the general inflation process is rapidly becoming a reality.” And so the RBI has raised its estimate for inflation to 7.0 per cent by March-end.

“If you chart inflation, there seems to be a clear break in 2006. Before that, inflation wasn't much of a problem; since then, it has been. Initially much of this was because of food price increases. But now prices are rising more widely, and it is hard not to conclude that monetary policy needs to be tightened substantially, so we can put inflation ‘back in the box’,” Joshua Felman, a former International Monetary Fund, or IMF, representative in India, said.

But monetary policy is a blunt instrument to beat inflation over its head with. The RBI rubbed this in: “Monetary policy works most efficiently while dealing with an inflationary situation when the fiscal situation is under control.”

Because of poor storage and infrastructure, there are huge productivity losses. “And supply is unable to keep up,” said Kumar. “At the same time, cereal yields have been stagnating.” A Nomura paper on food prices last September noted that the food weighting in consumer price inflation, or CPI, in advanced economies was typically between 10 and 20 per cent, whereas it was about one-third in China and as high as 46 per cent in India. “A sustained surge in food prices can have more pernicious effects if it unmoors inflationary expectations, impelling workers to demand higher wages to compensate for rising food costs, thus setting off a wage-price inflation spiral,” the Nomura report said. This is exactly what is happening in India.

With bank lending rates upward of 11 per cent, manufacturers face a nasty squeeze. FICCI’s Kumar pointed out that 90 per cent of State Bank of India lending over the past three quarters went towards infrastructure projects, and only 10 per cent went to manufacturing. “The cost of capital is likely to go up further,” said Kumar.

Dr Chakravarty Rangarajan, Chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, said food inflation has been a problem for over two years. “In a situation like this, management of the supply side is critical,” he told Business Today. In mitigation, Rangarajan said, prices of cereals like wheat and pulses have dropped, but the prices of meat, fish, eggs, vegetables and fruit have risen sharply.

Felman, who now works in the IMF’s research department in Washington, D.C., said he was worried about whether investment is truly recovering. “Here the signs are very mixed. Credit is growing nicely, and infrastructure projects such as power and roads seem to be moving ahead. But other greenfield projects seem stuck, held back by investor caution, land issues and the complex process of securing environmental clearances. So, investment does not seem to be booming the way it was before the crisis, and this is worrisome.”

The RBI’s quarterly review echoed with warnings. The current-account deficit, or CAD, will hit 3.5 per cent this fiscal year, and is “unsustainable”, the central bank said. But with global commodity prices rising, import bills look like staying high. Foreign direct investments, or FDI, could help finance this deficit, but the bad news is that FDI flows into construction, real estate, business and financial services have declined, while foreign institutional investors’ equity investments accounted for 79 per cent of net capital inflows of $36.7 billion during April-September 2010. This is clearly not desirable or sustainable, and the central bank said that “environment sensitive policies” – read Jairam Ramesh’s activism – have triggered a fall-off in FDI. “Added to this are the persistent procedural delays, land acquisition issues and availability of quality infrastructure,” the RBI said.

Will the UPA government quicken reforms to address these problems? The international economist was not sanguine. “Everyone expected that once the Left Front was kicked out of the coalition, reforms would accelerate. Instead, they've slowed down,” he said.

The IMF’s Felman said his final concern was the “governance deficit”. “A decade ago the question for reformers was whether the government would give the market sufficient space to operate,” he says. “Now, the issue is the reverse: whether the government has sufficient room to do what it needs to do, namely set fair rules of the game in which firms would operate. In a nation where there are more than one billion competing people, each striving for a fair chance in life, this is not just a problem. It is a tragedy.”