Friday, October 4, 2013

Crossing our River Styx


Crossing our River Styx

Last fortnight’s passage of the Food Security and Land Acquisition legislation was a tactical triumph for the ruling coalition.  The opposition had to bite its tongue; it was a clever feint, but the body blows are landing fast and hard on growth and investment, and we are against the ropes, bloodied and dazed.  The truth is that those in authority have lost all credibility, and those in business have lost their social contract.  Crony capitalism coupled with cruelly capricious decisions has gutted what was not so long ago a raging bull of an economy.

If you go back to the mid-2000s, India was growing very rapidly and the belief of the middle classes and business was that there was a very talented team running the economy, with an economist prime minister and a half-decent finance minister. There was faith that the central bank would keep inflation low and all would be well.

All of that has come to nought. The RBI let inflation get out of control. Relations between the RBI governor and the finance minister were appallingly bad.

Most of us do not seem to grasp the seriousness of the situation.  Food price inflation was ignored under the pretext that the benefits of growth needed to spread to rural India.  Gorged with high inflows of foreign funds, the government threw money around like a drunkard at a casino.  Indians felt they had an inalienable right to grow rapidly, that India was finally getting the growth it deserved.  The goal of “spreading” the riches to the mythical aam admi  became a moral and not an economic issue.

India did not recognise the fragility of growth. Prices – chiefly of food – rose and rose inexorably. If inflation is very high, people turn away from money.  They stop saving through the financial system and turn to gold.  What had almost never happened in any developing economy happened here – as the economy slowed down, there was a blowing out of the current account.  Instead of imports slowing, Indians shipped in more and more gold.  As the downturn deepened, investments fell and savings fell even more because of inflation, so people ‘saved’ with gold.  India’s current account was being financed by foreign savings, a.k.a. foreign fund inflows.  That was fine so long as growth was rapid.  But in 2012 India really started to slow down.  This had nothing to do with the United States, or Ben Bernanke, or the terror of “tapering”. Simply put, foreigners became very reluctant to lend money to spendthrift India.  The rupee’s exchange rate began to weaken a little over a year ago. When P. Chidambaram took over he initially tried to restore the credibility of the government but here’s what happened:

1.    The government still did not tackle Consumer Price Inflation.
2.    Chidambaram’s attempts to introduce reforms and reduce the budget deficit proved to be a chimera. The bankruptcy of policy was badly exposed when the government passed the Food Security Act.  This meant that it could not care less about the budget deficit.

Gold imports will climb even higher in the months ahead.  The rupee, which has already been factored in at 70 to the dollar, will slip even lower.  So what can we do? We need to restore credibility to policy.   We need big measures, and political courage.  We need to be able to stand up and say that the Food Security Bill is great but we cannot afford it right now.  We need to be able to say “We learned a lesson – when you have excellent growth, you don’t spend all the money.” 

The trouble is that our policy dinosaurs don’t view inflation as a problem or growth as fragile.  The result is that investors, both domestic and foreign, who have to deal with the real economy, have lost confidence.

The two most important and critically urgent goals now are: keep inflation low, and keep the budget deficit under control, or we will end up like Zimbabwe. 

“I would not use ‘crisis’ and ‘India’ in the same sentence,” new central bank governor Raghuram Rajan told reporters on September 4.  Yes, but how quickly have ‘growth’ and ‘India’ become antonyms.

(This column appeared in Business Today, Sept 29 2013)

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Is there a final frontier?

Going to the edge


The cliches and banalities pouring out over Neil Armstrong's death have been quite amusing.  Very few of us think of what it really means to be an explorer.  What hope and fear did Columbus nurse in his breast as he stood on the bridge of the Santa Maria 520 years ago this month?  What shout of exhilaration did "Stout Cortez" unloose as he gazed upon the Pacific with his eagle eyes while his men looked at each other with "wild surmise"? What kept Lewis and Clark going as they forged westward into unfamiliar territory across a vast continent? Our planet would not have been as it is now, peopled and thriving across every latitude, if men of great courage had not taken their lives in their hands and stepped across the divide into new worlds.  All of us have been reminded repeatedly about Armstrong's first words as he set foot on the Moon's surface on July 20, 1969, but he never really let on how he felt, a 38-year-old test pilot who learned to fly before he learned to drive, when he calmly took over the controls of the moon-landing craft from Apollo 11 and steered it to a soft landing in a boulder-strewn landscape with just 25 seconds of fuel left in its tanks.  That was real courage, and that is what gets our chests puffed up as we share in the unspeakable elation of discovery.  Never mind, as I was reminded when I went around the Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian, that the entire space race had been a rather silly and very expensive ego contest spawned by the Cold War.  What mattered was the wonderment that we could go where no man had gone before.  We need heroes very badly in the 21st Century, and we are sorely short of them.

Meanwhile, if you want to read a good obituary on Armstrong I recommend the Economist at http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/08/obituary.

Let me leave you with the first beautiful shot of Earthrise shot by William Anders from Apollo 8.  It shows how fragile our home is.  



Monday, February 28, 2011

Don’t pop the champagne open just yet

The Finance Minister gives with one hand, and takes away with the other. Income-tax exemption limits are raised marginally, but you will get hit on more items for service tax. And this is assuming that your food costs will drop a bit if Pranab Mukherjee's 300-crore magic formula works. For the full post go to http://bit.ly/indiabudget2

Fussbudget

Far away in Los Angeles, “The King’s Speech” won four Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Actor, just as Pranab Mukherjee rose to present the Union Budget for 2011-12 in Parliament. The finance minister spoke for 110 minutes, but certainly does not win any prizes for dramatically pushing India’s reforms into a new geostationary orbit.

...for the rest of my post go to http://bit.ly/pranabthree

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Serious, sincere, helpless

The Prime Minister came across after today’s TV-only press conference as the Great Stoic.

Clearly aimed at damage control and expectation management, his answers were sincere and candid, especially about the compromises that have to be made to keep a coalition together. His most startling analogy was to ask rhetorically if food, fertilizer and kerosene subsidies for the poor could be construed as revenue losses. “What is your starting point?” he asked in the context of the 2G spectrum being allocated at sub-market rates. One TV editor asked him if he was implying that 2G, too, was a subsidy. He side-stepped this one.

He should have been asked: “Are you comparing subsidies that help India’s poor with subsidised wireless spectrum that made the rich richer?”

Other answers: “This is coalition dharma…things are not entirely the way I would like them to be”; [on corruption] “I have to tolerate a lot … otherwise every six months we would have new elections.” “We shall overcome, we shall prevail, we will provide our country with a functioning government”; “As of that moment [May 2009] I had no reason to believe that anything seriously wrong had been done”; this despite the fact that “complaints were coming in [against Raja], complaints were from all sides”; “These irregularities shouldn’t have happened .. I am not very happy about these developments.”

There has been an amazing amount of public talk by government leaders ahead of the Budget session. Clearly, the prime minister sees, as he told the BBC, that a poor international image “saps our self-confidence”. He referred to self-confidence several times during the news conference, from his opening remarks onward. But on the lack of any reforms by UPA-II, and other signs of dithering, he had villains galore – state governments, the BJP, the coalition system. He did talk about “harsh punishment” for the corrupt and said “wrongdoers won’t escape this time”. And he made clear he would not throw in the towel – all this was a learning experience and he “relished” it, and likened himself to a CEO – if seven of ten decisions were good, “shareholders will say ‘job well done’”.

The prime minister also made a few key allusions to points that this Budget may address – the dire need to create a viable corporate-debt market, the need to mobilize funds from overseas in a Infrastructure Development Fund, and a push for the PPP (public-private partnership) model in infrastructure development. There are also clear signs that Pranab Mukherjee will start the process of curbing or axing ministers’ discretionary powers, widely seen as a font of corruption.

Overall, Manmohan Singh came across as sincere, serious, and a bit helpless. “I have a job to do. We have a lot of unfinished business. I will stay the course,” he said, stoically.

[This post also appeared on the Business Today website at http://bit.ly/primeminister]