Friday, October 4, 2013
Crossing our River Styx
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Is there a final frontier?
Going to the edge
The cliches and banalities pouring out over Neil Armstrong's death have been quite amusing. Very few of us think of what it really means to be an explorer. What hope and fear did Columbus nurse in his breast as he stood on the bridge of the Santa Maria 520 years ago this month? What shout of exhilaration did "Stout Cortez" unloose as he gazed upon the Pacific with his eagle eyes while his men looked at each other with "wild surmise"? What kept Lewis and Clark going as they forged westward into unfamiliar territory across a vast continent? Our planet would not have been as it is now, peopled and thriving across every latitude, if men of great courage had not taken their lives in their hands and stepped across the divide into new worlds. All of us have been reminded repeatedly about Armstrong's first words as he set foot on the Moon's surface on July 20, 1969, but he never really let on how he felt, a 38-year-old test pilot who learned to fly before he learned to drive, when he calmly took over the controls of the moon-landing craft from Apollo 11 and steered it to a soft landing in a boulder-strewn landscape with just 25 seconds of fuel left in its tanks. That was real courage, and that is what gets our chests puffed up as we share in the unspeakable elation of discovery. Never mind, as I was reminded when I went around the Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian, that the entire space race had been a rather silly and very expensive ego contest spawned by the Cold War. What mattered was the wonderment that we could go where no man had gone before. We need heroes very badly in the 21st Century, and we are sorely short of them.
Meanwhile, if you want to read a good obituary on Armstrong I recommend the Economist at http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/08/obituary.
Let me leave you with the first beautiful shot of Earthrise shot by William Anders from Apollo 8. It shows how fragile our home is.
Monday, February 28, 2011
Don’t pop the champagne open just yet
Fussbudget
...for the rest of my post go to http://bit.ly/pranabthree
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Serious, sincere, helpless
The Prime Minister came across after today’s TV-only press conference as the Great Stoic.
Clearly aimed at damage control and expectation management, his answers were sincere and candid, especially about the compromises that have to be made to keep a coalition together. His most startling analogy was to ask rhetorically if food, fertilizer and kerosene subsidies for the poor could be construed as revenue losses. “What is your starting point?” he asked in the context of the 2G spectrum being allocated at sub-market rates. One TV editor asked him if he was implying that 2G, too, was a subsidy. He side-stepped this one.
He should have been asked: “Are you comparing subsidies that help India’s poor with subsidised wireless spectrum that made the rich richer?”
Other answers: “This is coalition dharma…things are not entirely the way I would like them to be”; [on corruption] “I have to tolerate a lot … otherwise every six months we would have new elections.” “We shall overcome, we shall prevail, we will provide our country with a functioning government”; “As of that moment [May 2009] I had no reason to believe that anything seriously wrong had been done”; this despite the fact that “complaints were coming in [against Raja], complaints were from all sides”; “These irregularities shouldn’t have happened .. I am not very happy about these developments.”
There has been an amazing amount of public talk by government leaders ahead of the Budget session. Clearly, the prime minister sees, as he told the BBC, that a poor international image “saps our self-confidence”. He referred to self-confidence several times during the news conference, from his opening remarks onward. But on the lack of any reforms by UPA-II, and other signs of dithering, he had villains galore – state governments, the BJP, the coalition system. He did talk about “harsh punishment” for the corrupt and said “wrongdoers won’t escape this time”. And he made clear he would not throw in the towel – all this was a learning experience and he “relished” it, and likened himself to a CEO – if seven of ten decisions were good, “shareholders will say ‘job well done’”.
The prime minister also made a few key allusions to points that this Budget may address – the dire need to create a viable corporate-debt market, the need to mobilize funds from overseas in a Infrastructure Development Fund, and a push for the PPP (public-private partnership) model in infrastructure development. There are also clear signs that Pranab Mukherjee will start the process of curbing or axing ministers’ discretionary powers, widely seen as a font of corruption.
Overall, Manmohan Singh came across as sincere, serious, and a bit helpless. “I have a job to do. We have a lot of unfinished business. I will stay the course,” he said, stoically.
[This post also appeared on the Business Today website at http://bit.ly/primeminister]